Navigating Perspectives: Maritime Transport Development - Insights from Semester 3 Cadets at STIP Jakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/pendekar.v2i1.574Keywords:
Academic Preparedness, Cadet Perspectives, English Maritime, Global Maritime Transport, Maritime EducationAbstract
This qualitative research delves into the perspectives of 240 Semester 3 cadets at the Maritime Institute Jakarta (STIP Jakarta) on Maritime Transport Development in the Global Scale. Over a span of three semesters, these cadets undergo academic, mental, vocational, and professional preparation for internships in the shipping, cargo, or international delivery industry. The study aims to comprehensively understand their insights on the main opportunities, threats, and challenges in the dynamic landscape of global maritime transport. The findings reveal a collective awareness among cadets of the importance of academic preparedness, emphasizing the need for a seamless transition from theoretical knowledge to practical application. Linguistic proficiency, particularly in English Maritime, emerges as a central theme, highlighting its pivotal role in preparing cadets for international roles. The research illuminates a positive outlook on opportunities within the maritime sector, with cadets expressing enthusiasm for emerging technologies, automation, and sustainable practices. However, realistic concerns are voiced about potential threats such as job market saturation and the impact of automation on traditional roles. These concerns underscore the need for adaptive responses from educational institutions to equip cadets with skills relevant to the evolving industry. Challenges such as language barriers and limited exposure to real-world scenarios are identified, suggesting areas for improvement in maritime education. The implications of the research extend beyond STIP Jakarta, urging a more dynamic and responsive approach to maritime education globally. Recommendations include enhancing experiential learning, continuous language training, and incorporating emerging trends into curricula. The findings and recommendations provide a valuable roadmap for institutions seeking to prepare the next generation of maritime professionals for the complexities of the global maritime industry.
References
Balkin, R. (2006). The international maritime organization and maritime security. Tul. Mar. LJ, 30, 1.
Bertram, C., Meierkord, A., & Day, L. (2018). The cadet experience: understanding cadet outcomes. Department for Education.
Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815.
Christenson, S., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement (Vol. 840). Springer.
Christodoulou-Varotsi, I., & Pentsov, D. A. (2008). The STCW Convention and related instruments. Maritime Work Law Fundamentals: Responsible Shipowners, Reliable Seafarers, 422–639.
Comtois, C., & Slack, B. (2017). Sustainable development and corporate strategies of the maritime industry. In Ports, Cities, and Global Supply Chains (pp. 249–262). Routledge.
de la Peña Zarzuelo, I., Soeane, M. J. F., & Bermúdez, B. L. (2020). Industry 4.0 in the port and maritime industry: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 20, 100173.
Edirisinghe, P., Zhihong, J., & Lixin, S. (2016). The Direction of Maritime Education and Training development: A Conceptual Approach. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Maritime Education and Training, Dalian Maritime University, 15th October.
Erdogan, O., & Demirel, E. (2017). New Technologies in Maritime Education and Training, Turkish Experiment. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(6), 947–952.
Ferritto, V. R. (2016). Maritime education factors and presenteeism: a comparative quantitative study. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 15, 353–380.
Hui, Z., & Ishak, N. A. B. (2022). A Review of Maritime English Teaching Curriculum in China. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, 13(15), 5–12.
Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Padgett, D. K. (2016). Qualitative methods in social work research (Vol. 36). Sage publications.
Plaza-Hernández, M., Gil-González, A. B., Rodríguez-González, S., Prieto-Tejedor, J., & Corchado-Rodríguez, J. M. (2021). Integration of IoT technologies in the maritime industry. Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Special Sessions, 17th International Conference, 107–115.
Saldana, J. (2014). Thinking qualitatively: Methods of mind. SAGE publications.
Sanchez-Gonzalez, P.-L., Díaz-Gutiérrez, D., Leo, T. J., & Núñez-Rivas, L. R. (2019). Toward digitalization of maritime transport? Sensors, 19(4), 926.
Trenkner, P. (2009). Maritime English requirements and the revised STCW. Szczecin: Proceedings of the International Maritime English Conference IMEC, 21, 5–10.
Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311–325.
Young, C. (1995). Comprehensive Revision of the STCW convention: an overview. J. Mar. L. & Com., 26, 1.
Zaderei, A. (2020). Ensuring the sustainability of the human resources management system of maritime industry enterprises. Access: Access to Science, Business, Innovation in Digital Economy, 1(2), 146–156.
