Evaluasi Program Dan Penilaian Hasil Pembelajaran Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (Ktsp) Di Sekolah Dasar

  • Ina Magdalena Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
  • Deswita Sawitri Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
  • Balqis Nabila Ayu Putri Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
  • Septyana Rahmawati Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
Keywords: KTSP, evaluasi, kurikulum, implementasi, penilaian hasil belajar

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the development and implementation of the School-Based Curriculum (KTSP) in the field. The evaluation is conducted using the CIPPO model (context, input, process, product, and outcome), which involves several aspects such as KTSP documents, the development of syllabi and lesson plans, implementation of teaching and learning, and assessment of learning outcomes. The results of the study show that the implementation of KTSP is not yet optimal due to several factors, such as the lack of socialization, guidance, and supervision from the Education Office, as well as the limited number of supervisors. Other reasons include the perception that KTSP still focuses on the knowledge dimension, limited infrastructure, financial constraints, and difficulties in meeting the requirements for smaller class groups. The evaluation of the process indicates that the preparation of KTSP documents is not yet optimal, syllabi and lesson plans do not comply with the standards, and classroom management does not meet the process standards. The assessment of learning outcomes also does not fully comply with the assessment standards, and there is a lack of teachers' understanding of assessment principles. In the assessment system, various techniques such as written tests, observation, performance tests, assignments, oral tests, portfolio assessment, self-assessment, and peer assessment can be used. The assessment principles that should be applied include validity, objectivity, fairness, integration, disclosure, comprehensiveness, continuity, systematicity, criterion-referenced testing, and accountability. The findings of this study can serve as a basis for improving the development and implementation of KTSP and enhancing the assessment system in education.

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi dan Cepi Safrudin Abdul Jabar. (2004). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Pedoman Teoretis Praktis Bagi Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Kunandar. (2007). Guru Profesional Implementasi KTSP dan Sukses dalam Sertifikasi Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Mulyasa, E. (2009). Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan: Kemandirian Guru dan Kepala Sekolah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Widoyoko, S. Eko Putro. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran: Panduan Praktis Bagi Pendidik dan Calon Pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Depdiknas (2004). Pedoman umum sistem penilaian berbasis kompetensi. Jakarta: Direktorat PLP, Ditjen Dikdasmen, Depdiknas.
Depdiknas (2004). Penilaian portofolio. Jakarta: Direktorat PLP, Ditjen Dikdasmen, Depdiknas.
Direktorat P2TK dan KPT. 2005. Pedoman sistem asesmen berbasis kompetensi. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendididian Tinggi, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Direktorat PMU. 2004. Pedoman umum sistem penilaian kurikulum berbasis kompetensi. Jakarta: Direktorat PMU, Ditjen Dikdasmen, Depdiknas.
Gronlund, N.E. & Linn. R.L. 1990. Measurement and evaluation in teaching. 6-th ed. New York : Macmillan Publishing Company.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2007 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan untuk Satuan Pendidikan dasar dan Menengah.
Published
2023-07-17
How to Cite
Ina Magdalena, Deswita Sawitri, Balqis Nabila Ayu Putri, & Septyana Rahmawati. (2023). Evaluasi Program Dan Penilaian Hasil Pembelajaran Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (Ktsp) Di Sekolah Dasar. Pendekar : Jurnal Pendidikan Berkarakter, 1(4), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.51903/pendekar.v1i4.304