Integritas Akademik dan Etika Penggunaan AI Generatif pada Pembelajaran TJKT di SMK: Usulan Batas Penggunaan Berbasis Jenis Tugas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/pendekar.v4i5.1994Keywords:
etika kecerdasan artifisial, integritas akademik, kecerdasan artifisial generatif, pendidikan vokasi, penilaian pembelajaranAbstract
Kecerdasan artifisial generatif kini mudah diakses peserta didik sekolah menengah kejuruan, dan hal itu memunculkan persoalan integritas akademik yang tidak terjawab oleh pelarangan menyeluruh. Pedoman kelembagaan yang tersedia sebagian besar berasal dari pendidikan tinggi dan memperlakukan tugas sebagai satu kategori tunggal, padahal program keahlian Teknik Jaringan Komputer dan Telekomunikasi (TJKT) memadukan penguasaan konsep dengan praktik psikomotor tersupervisi, prosedur yang menyangkut keselamatan kerja, dan laporan praktik kerja lapangan. Artikel ini merupakan kajian konseptual, bukan penelitian empiris: artikel ini mensintesis literatur bertelaah sejawat tentang AI generatif, integritas akademik, dan literasi AI, bersama kebijakan nasional, lalu menurunkan sebuah kerangka, bukan melaporkan data lapangan. Tiga keluaran diusulkan. Pertama, pemetaan jenis tugas TJKT terhadap kompetensi yang sesungguhnya dinilai dan titik rawan integritas yang muncul bila AI dipakai tanpa batas. Kedua, kerangka batas penggunaan yang memberi setiap jenis tugas satu dari empat status, dari boleh sebagai pendamping belajar hingga tidak boleh, masing-masing disertai bukti integritas yang wajib diserahkan. Ketiga, indikator yang dapat diamati guru tanpa perangkat deteksi, karena pencocokan teks konvensional saja tidak memadai. Kerangka ini adalah proposisi yang perlu diuji dan belum diujicobakan di sekolah mana pun.
References
Abdaljaleel, M., Barakat, M., Alsanafi, M., Salim, N. A., Abazid, H., Malaeb, D., … Sallam, M. (2024). A Multinational Study on the Factors Influencing University Students’ Attitudes and Usage of ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 14, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52549-8
Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in Academia: Academic Integrity Hangs in the Balance. Technology in Society, 75, 102370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A Comprehensive AI Policy Education Framework for University Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ Voices on Generative AI: Perceptions, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and Cheating: Ensuring Academic Integrity in the Era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So What If ChatGPT Wrote It?” Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Opportunities, Challenges and Implications of Generative Conversational AI for Research, Practice and Policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., … Koedinger, K. R. (2022). Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2025). Generative AI in Higher Education: A Global Perspective of Institutional Adoption Policies and Guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Pembangunan Manusia dan Kebudayaan. (2026). Surat Keputusan Bersama Tujuh Menteri tentang Pedoman Pemanfaatan dan Pembelajaran Teknologi Digital dan Kecerdasan Artifisial pada Jalur Pendidikan Formal, Nonformal, dan Informal (ditetapkan 12 Maret 2026). Jakarta: Kemenko PMK. Diakses dari https://kemenkopmk.go.id/node/6214
Lee, D., Arnold, M., Srivastava, A., Plastow, K., Strelan, P., Ploeckl, F., … Palmer, E. (2024). The Impact of Generative AI on Higher Education Learning and Teaching: A Study of Educators’ Perspectives. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221
Lo, C. K. (2023). What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., Darwis, A., & Marzuki. (2023). Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student’s Perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296
Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The Impact of AI Writing Tools on the Content and Organization of Students’ Writing: EFL Teachers’ Perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2236469. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469
Moorhouse, B. L., Yeo, M. A., & Wan, Y. (2023). Generative AI Tools and Assessment: Guidelines of the World’s Top-Ranking Universities. Computers and Education Open, 5, 100151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI Literacy: An Exploratory Review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Perkins, M. (2023). Academic Integrity Considerations of AI Large Language Models in the Post-Pandemic Era: ChatGPT and Beyond. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(2), Article 07. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07
Stöhr, C., Ou, A. W., & Malmström, H. (2024). Perceptions and Usage of AI Chatbots Among Students in Higher Education Across Genders, Academic Levels and Fields of Study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100259
Strzelecki, A. (2024). To Use or Not to Use ChatGPT in Higher Education? A Study of Students’ Acceptance and Use of Technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 5142–5155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What If the Devil Is My Guardian Angel: ChatGPT as a Case Study of Using Chatbots in Education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 15.
Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the Future of Artificial Intelligence in the Classroom: The Relevance of AI Literacy, Prompt Engineering, and Critical Thinking in Modern Education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., & Román-González, M. (2024). Generative AI and the Future of Higher Education: A Threat to Academic Integrity or Reformation? Evidence from Multicultural Perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The Effects of Over-Reliance on AI Dialogue Systems on Students’ Cognitive Abilities: A Systematic Review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Puji Lestari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
