PERILAKU GENERASI Z TERHADAP POTENSI ARROGANCE DAN COLLUSION DALAM FRAUD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/2zdxaw41Kata Kunci:
arrogance, collusion, fraud, z generationAbstrak
Financial fraud is a serious issue that can be influenced by individual behavior. Generation Z, shaped by technological advancement and social media, has distinctive behavioral patterns that may contribute to the emergence of arrogance and collusion, in line with the Fraud Hexagon theory. This study aims to analyze the relationship between Generation Z’s behavior in terms of ethics, mindset, and motivation and the potential emergence of arrogance and collusion. The method used is a literature review with a qualitative descriptive approach, utilizing secondary data from global survey reports (McKinsey, Deloitte) and scientific literature. The results show that Generation Z’s behavior is linked to the risks of arrogance and collusion, either reinforcing or weakening the potential for fraud. These findings provide insight for developing fraud prevention strategies based on generational behavior.
Referensi
ACFE. (2024). THE NATIONS OCCUPATIONAL FRAUD 2024: A Report to the Nations.
Buchanan, A., & Kern, M. L. (2017). The benefit mindset: The psychology of contribution and everyday leadership. International Journal of Wellbeing, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v7i1.538
Cassino, P., & Rogers, W. (2016). Hirschi’s Social Bonding Theory Nearly 45 Years Later: A comparison of a traditional, contemporary and hybrid model. Theory in Action, 9(2), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.3798/tia.1937-0237.16009
Chimonaki, C., Papadakis, S., & Lemonakis, C. (2023). Perspectives in fraud theories – A systematic review approach. F1000Research, 12, 933. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.131896.1
Englert, B., Sievert, M., Helmig, B., & Jansen, K. (2024). The incongruity of misfit: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Human Relations, 77(9), 1306–1332. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267231187751
Hanifah, R. (2020). FAKTOR DETERMINAN REMAJA PELAKU PENCURIAN: PERSPEKTIF TEORI KONTROL SOSIAL. www.insancendekiamandiri.co.id
Humphrey, E. A., Isenmilia, P. A., & Omoye, A. S. (2023). Fraud Pentagon: Detection of Financial Statement Fraud in a Firm. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 14(6), 102. https://doi.org/10.36941/mjss-2023-0040
Kagias, P., Cheliatsidou, A., Garefalakis, A., Azibi, J., & Sariannidis, N. (2022). The fraud triangle – an alternative approach. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(3), 908–924. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-07-2021-0159
Koehn, M. A., Okan, C., & Jonason, P. K. (2019). A primer on the Dark Triad traits. Australian Journal of Psychology, 71(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12198
Kristyowati, Y. (2021). GENERASI “Z” DAN STRATEGI MELAYANINYA. Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Kristiani. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/w3d7s
Kuch, L. M. (2025). AN EXTENSION OF THE EGO-DEFENSIVE MODEL TO INCLUDE COLLECTIVE SELF-ESTEEM. Michigan State University.
Lase, D., & Daeli, D. O. (2020). Pembelajaran Antargenerasi Untuk Masyarakat Berkelanjutan: Sebuah Kajian Literatur Dan Implikasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial, 6(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.23887/jiis.v6i2.28138
Maiwan, M. (2018). MEMAHAMI TEORI-TEORI ETIKA: CAKRAWALA DAN PANDANGAN. JURNAL ILMIAH MIMBAR DEMOKRASI.
McKinsey. (2024). What is Gen Z.
Melati, R., & Nur Aisyah, S. (2024). LITERATURE REVIEW : ANALISIS PENGARUH SIFAT MACHIAVELLIANISME, ETIKA DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL TERHADAP PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN ETIS KONSULTAN PAJAK. In Journal of Management and Innovation Entrepreunership (JMIE) (Vol. 1, Issue 2).
Miswardi, Nasfi, & Antoni. (2021). ETIKA, MORALITAS DAN PENEGAK HUKUM. Menara Ilmu: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Ilmiah.
Muris, P., Jeurissen, A., Rooswinkel, M., & Meesters, C. (2022). Good Traits, Bad Traits, and ‘Ugly’ Behavior: Relations between the Dark Triad, Honesty-Humility, Other HEXACO Personality Traits, and Externalizing Problems in Adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 31(12), 3247–3257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-022-02344-8
Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Otgaar, H., & Meijer, E. (2017). The Malevolent Side of Human Nature: A Meta-Analysis and Critical Review of the Literature on the Dark Triad (Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616666070
Nizarudin, A., Nugroho, A. A., Agustina, D., & Anggita, W. (2023). Comparative Analysis Of Crowe’s Fraud Pentagon Theory On Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Jurnal Akuntansi, 27(01), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.24912/jm.v27i1.1104
Prihartanta, W., Perpustakaan, J. I., & Komunikasi, D. (2015). TEORI-TEORI MOTIVASI. In Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-raniry (Vol. 1, Issue 83).
Retnowati, W., T, S., Saraswati, E., & Andayani, S. (2024). CROWE’S FRAUD PENTAGON THEORY REVIEW OF FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WITH AUDIT COMMITTEE MODERATION. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS SOCIETY.
Satria, M. R. (2022). PERAN TEORI AGENSI DALAM ISSUE BIDANG AKUNTANSI. LAND JOURNAL, 3(2).
Sawitri, D. R. (2023). Perkembangan Karier Generasi Z: Tantangan dan Strategi dalam Mewujudkan SDM Indonesia yang Unggul.
Singh, A. (2024). A comparative study among superiority and inferiority complex between adolescent boys and girls. International Journal of Home Science, 10(2), 45–48. https://www.homesciencejournal.com
Sudarmanto, E. (2020). Manajemen Risiko: Deteksi Dini Upaya Pencegahan Fraud. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen. https://doi.org/10.32502/jimn.v9i2.2
Suryandari, N., & Endiana, I. (2019). Fraudulent Financial Statement (A. Yuesti, Ed.).
Sutherland, E. H. (1940). White-Collar Criminality. American Sociological Review, 5(1), 1–12.
Vousinas, G. L. (2019a). Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128
Vousinas, G. L. (2019b). Elaborating on the theory of fraud. New theoretical extensions. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128
Weinberg, I., & Ronningstam, E. (2022). Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Progress in Understanding and Treatment. Focus, 20(4), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.20220052
