Pengaruh Automasi Teknologi Produksi dan Produktivitas Tenaga Kerja Terhadap Efisiensi Produksi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/6aanw321Keywords:
Automation, Labor productivity, Production efficiencyAbstract
This study examines the effect of Production Technology Automation and Labor Productivity on Production Efficiency at PT Superior Porcelain Sukses. The research employed a quantitative causal-associative design. From 125 responses collected, 12 responses were excluded during screening because they showed identical response patterns, resulting in 113 valid respondents. The data were analyzed using validity and reliability tests, classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression, t-test, F-test, correlation, and coefficient of determination. The results indicate that Production Technology Automation has a positive and significant effect on Production Efficiency (B=0.312; t=6.750; p<0.001), while Labor Productivity also has a positive and significant effect (B=0.433; t=9.580; p<0.001). Simultaneously, both independent variables significantly affect Production Efficiency (F=73.109; p<0.001), with R Square=0.572. A sensitivity check using quadratic terms did not provide sufficient evidence to replace the linear model; therefore, the main linear model was retained while the reported linearity concern is acknowledged.
References
[1] M. P. Groover, Automation, Production Systems, and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 4th ed. Pearson, 2020.
[2] A. Al Faisal, Alparij, and Ihsan, “Pengaruh otomatisasi mesin produksi dan efisiensi terhadap produktivitas kerja karyawan di PT Clama Indonesia,” 2024.
[3] Susandi and Hermawan, “Minimalisasi ongkos unit produksi dengan otomatisasi proses operasi,” 2016.
[4] Susandi, Nur, and Dewi, “The Effect of Work System Optimization on the Efficiency and Productivity Assembly Workstation,” 2025.
[5] Wibisono and Purnama, “Analisis beban kerja untuk optimalisasi produktivitas tenaga kerja pada lini produksi mesin pond,” 2025.
[6] Ramadhan, Kukreja, and Duran, “Productivity Improvement through Work Measurement and Time Study Analysis,” 2024.
[7] F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.
[8] C. W. Cobb and P. H. Douglas, “A theory of production,” The American Economic Review, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 139–165, 1928.
[9] M. J. Farrell, “The measurement of productive efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 253–281, 1957, doi: 10.2307/2343100.
[10] Rokhman and Fahruddin, “Global industrial efficiency revolutionized by automated lathe,” 2024.
[11] Makowski and Kajikawa, “Automation-driven innovation management,” 2021.
[12] Ghahramani et al., “AI-based modeling and data-driven evaluation for smart manufacturing processes,” 2020.
[13] Bahrudin and Wahyuni, “Pengukuran produktivitas kerja karyawan,” 2017.
[14] Hariastuti, “Analisis fungsi produksi Cobb-Douglas dalam meningkatkan produktivitas tenaga kerja,” 2010.
[15] V. Gaspersz, Manajemen Produktivitas Total, 2011.
[16] Armando, “Hubungan antara kepuasan karyawan, produktivitas kerja, dan kualitas proses produksi terhadap efisiensi operasional,” 2024.
[17] Asrizal, “Efisiensi produksi dan produktivitas tenaga kerja industri kecil di Indonesia,” 2017.
[18] Asrizal, “Efisiensi produksi dan produktivitas tenaga kerja industri mikro dan kecil di Indonesia,” 2018.
[19] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 MANAJEMEN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
