Pengaruh Promosi, Harga, dan Variasi Produk terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Konsumen pada Toko Retail Toserba Yogya Ketanggungan

Authors

  • Khana Amelia Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer
  • Vivi Kumalasari Subroto Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/ecfzrk86

Keywords:

Promotion, Price, product variety, purchasing decisions, local retail

Abstract

Increasingly tight retail competition requires business actors to design effective marketing strategies to influence consumer purchasing decisions. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the influence of promotion, price, and product variety on consumer purchasing decisions at the Yogya Ketanggungan Department Store. This study uses a quantitative approach with a survey method of 100 respondents selected using a purposive sampling technique, with data collection through a Likert scale questionnaire and analysis using multiple linear regression with the help of SPSS. The results of the study indicate that simultaneously promotion, price, and product variety have a significant effect on purchasing decisions with a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.854, which means that 85.4% of the variation in purchasing decisions can be explained by these three variables. Partially, price and product variety are proven to have a significant effect on purchasing decisions, while promotions do not show a significant effect. These findings indicate that local retail consumers tend to be more sensitive to price factors and product variety than promotional activities, so the implication is that retail business actors need to focus more on strategies for competitive pricing and providing a complete product variety to increase consumer purchasing decisions.

References

[1] D. A. R. Sukmawati, M. Mathori, and A. Marzuki, “PENGARUH PROMOSI, HARGA, DAN KUALITAS PRODUK TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN PRODUK SKINCARE SOMETHINC,” J. Ris. Akunt. dan Bisnis Indones., vol. 2, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.32477/jrabi.v2i2.487.

[2] M. Herman Djaya, “Pengaruh Kualitas Produk dan Promosi Produk Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian,” Abhakte J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 16–24, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.24929/abhakte.v1i2.3053.

[3] D. Marlius and N. Jovanka, “PENGARUH HARGA DAN PROMOSI TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN KONSUMEN Y.O.U PADA HASANAH MART AIR HAJI,” J. Econ., vol. 2, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.55681/economina.v2i2.326.

[4] D. Nurrahman and A. Utama, “Pengaruh variasi produk terhadap keputusan pembelian konsumen,” J. Adm. Bisnis, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 22–30, 2016.

[5] Nurliyanti and et al., “Pengaruh Harga dan Promosi terhadap Keputusan Pembelian,” J. Manaj. Pemasar., 2022.

[6] Handayani and Setyawan, “Pengaruh Promosi, Harga, dan Variasi Produk terhadap Keputusan Pembelian,” J. Manaj., 2023.

[7] Wibowo and Sari, “Analisis Pengaruh Harga dan Variasi Produk terhadap Keputusan Pembelian,” J. Manaj., 2020.

[8] J. A. Howard and J. N. Sheth, The Theory of Buyer Behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1969.

[9] F. Tjiptono, Strategi Pemasaran. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2016.

[10] Siregar and Harahap, “Pengaruh Promosi dan Harga terhadap Keputusan Pembelian,” J. Ekon. dan Bisnis, 2021.

[11] V. A. Zeithaml, “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value,” J. Mark., 1988.

[12] M. Levy and B. A. Weitz, Retailing Management. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012.

[13] P. Kotler and G. Armstrong, Principles of Marketing. New Jersey: Pearson Education, 2018.

[14] Prof. Dr. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, daan R&D, 2nd ed. Yogyakarta: ALFABETA, cv, 2019.

[15] H. Umar, Metode Penelitian untuk Skripsi dan Tesis. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.

[16] J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2018.

[17] I. Ghozali, Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-16

How to Cite

Pengaruh Promosi, Harga, dan Variasi Produk terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Konsumen pada Toko Retail Toserba Yogya Ketanggungan. (2026). MANAJEMEN, 6(1), 236-242. https://doi.org/10.51903/ecfzrk86