Tinjauan Prosedur Pengisian Notam di UPBU pada PIA Wilayah Jakarta

Authors

  • Metha Yurike Cartika Politeknik Penerbangan Indonesia
  • Dhian Supardam Politeknik Penerbangan Indonesia
  • Novita Ayu Permatasari Politeknik Penerbangan Indonesia Curug

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/xsjhrt23

Keywords:

NOTAM, Aerodrome Reporting Officer (ARO), Training

Abstract

This study examines the NOTAM  submission procedures at Airport Operator Units (UPBU) within the Aeronautical Information Service (PIA) in the Jakarta region. The background of the problem is the discrepancy between current procedures and the CASR 139 regulation, where errors in NOTAM submission such as typos, incorrect dates, or NOTAM content can pose a significant threat to flight safety. This research aims to analyze the impact of these errors and identify the contributing factors. Using a qualitative methodology, the study delves into in-depth information from the personnel involved to understand their experiences and challenges. The findings reveal that UPBU reporting officers do not adhere to the CASR 139 document because they have not received specific training or briefings on NOTAMs before assuming their duties. This lack of understanding leads to inaccurate NOTAM data submissions, deviating from the standards outlined in the CASR 139 document. As a solution, this study proposes the implementation of a specific training program for NOTAM reporting personnel to improve their understanding and competence, ensuring that NOTAM procedures are carried out according to the proper standards to maintain flight safety.



References

[1] C. Validation, Annex 15 1, no. September. 1999.

[2] S. Sintoarti and S. Sintoarti, “Susi Sintoarti Curug, 29 Maret 2023,” 2023.

[3] A. I. Services, Doc 8126 Aeronautical Information Services. 2021.

[4] “PR 21 Aerodrome Daratan”.

[5] A. R. Garcia, S. B. Filipe, C. Fernandes, C. Estevão, and G. Ramos, “No 主観的健康感を中心とした在宅高齢者における 健康関連指標に関する共分散構造分析Title,” PENTINGNYA KOMPETENSI, Motiv. DAN KEPUASAN KERJA MENDORONG PRESTASI KERJA, vol. 06, no. 01, pp. 10–18, 2020.

[6] “LOCA Airnav PIA Wilayah Jakarta - UPBU Sintang Tebelian 2023.pdf.”

[7] D. Ananda et al., “ANALISIS DAMPAK KETERLAMBATAN SUMBER DATA DALAM MENGAJUKAN REQUEST NOTAM RUANG UDARA,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 24–31, 2025.

[8] D. Assyakurrohim, D. Ikhram, R. A. Sirodj, and M. W. Afgani, “Metode Studi Kasus dalam Penelitian Kualitatif,” J. Pendidik. Sains dan Komput., vol. 3, no. 01, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi: 10.47709/jpsk.v3i01.1951.

[9] G. Symon and C. Cassell, “Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges,” Qual. Organ. Res. Core Methods Curr. Challenges, 2017, doi: 10.4135/9781526435620.

[10] A. Anisa, S. Paembonan, and R. Suppa, “Rancang Bangun Alat Pengukur Tinggi Badan Otomatis Menggunakan Arduino Pada Posyandu Kelurahan Sampoddo,” J. Inform. dan Tek. Elektro Terap., vol. 13, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.23960/jitet.v13i1.5792.

[11] Sugiyono, Metode penelitian manajemen, no. February 2025. 2013.

[12] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. 2022.

[13] V. Wiratna Sujarweni, “Metodologi Penelitian,” PT. Rineka Cipta, Cet.XII)an Prakt. (Jakarta PT. Rineka Cipta, Cet.XII), p. 107, 2014.

[14] C. Carmona, S. Baxter, and C. Carroll, “Systematic review of the methodological literature for integrating qualitative evidence syntheses into health guideline development,” Res. Synth. Methods, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 491–505, 2021, doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1483.

[15] P. G. Subhaktiyasa, “Pendekatan Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif,” J. Ilm. Profesi Pendidik., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 2721–2731, 2024.

[16] R. Chand, “Framework for Identifying Research Gaps for Future Academic Research,” IRA Int. J. Educ. Multidiscip. Stud., vol. 19, no. 2, p. 160, 2023, doi: 10.21013/jems.v19.n2.p12.

Published

2025-10-11

How to Cite

Tinjauan Prosedur Pengisian Notam di UPBU pada PIA Wilayah Jakarta. (2025). MANAJEMEN, 5(2), 233-243. https://doi.org/10.51903/xsjhrt23