DETERMINAN LIKUIDITAS TERHADAP FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE DI INDUSTRI F&B YANG TERDAFTAR PADA BURSA EFEK INDONESIA

Ulfa Febriani

doi:10.51903/dsnnzq39

Authors

Ulfa Febriani Universitas Trisakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/dsnnzq39

Keywords:

Company Size, Financial performance, Liquidity

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the factors that influence liquidity on financial performance in the food and beverage industry sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sample selected includes 24 companies in the food and beverage sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2018 to 2023. The sampling procedure applied uses purposive sampling techniques, while the analysis method used panel data regression. The independent variables in this study was liquidity, leverage, company size, company age, board size, and board independence. The dependent variable was financial performance. The results indicate that board size, company size, company age, and leverage do not affect financial performance. Meanwhile, board independence and liquidity do affect firm performance. This study provides insight into the factors influencing firm value in the food and beverage sector, offers managerial implications and suggestions for future research, emphasizing the importance of sustainable growth in creating added value for stakeholders and enhancing industry competitiveness. This study also suggests exploring other variables that may influence financial results, offering a comprehensive understanding of industry dynamics.

References

[1] Zhong, Y., et al., “Technology investment and firm competitiveness in dynamic markets,” Journal of Business Strategy, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 110–125, 2023.

[2] I. Warsito, “Perkembangan industri makanan dan minuman Indonesia Triwulan II 2024,” Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia, 2024.

[3] R. Al-Shaer, N. Gharios, and S. Garios, “Board independence and firm performance: A cross-country analysis,” Corporate Governance Review, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 45–67, 2023.

[4] S. Garios, N. Al-Shaer, and J. Hasan, “Corporate board independence and value creation in emerging markets,” International Journal of Finance and Economics, vol. 19, pp. 212–229, 2024.

[5] M. Amedi and M. Mustafa, “Independent boards and performance efficiency: Evidence from ASEAN firms,” Asian Economic and Financial Review, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 958–974, 2020.

[6] C. Martinez, F. Puni, and R. Anlesinya, “Board diversity and firm profitability: Evidence from global markets,” International Journal of Business Research, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 130–148, 2020.

[7] F. Puni and R. Anlesinya, “Corporate boards and strategic decision-making in emerging economies,” Corporate Management Studies, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 300–319, 2020.

[8] A. Goel, P. Brahma, and M. Varghese, “Board size and firm value: Regional comparison across global industries,” Global Business Review, vol. 28, pp. 401–420, 2022.

[9] P. Brahma, A. Goel, and R. Varghese, “Board structure and firm cost efficiency in Nigerian manufacturing,” African Journal of Management Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 99–115, 2021.

[10] S. Fiandrino, M. Amin, and T. Varghese, “Corporate governance and CSR practices: Evidence from Europe and Indonesia,” Sustainability Journal, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1–16, 2018.

[11] M. Amin, “The role of board size in enhancing CSR performance in ASEAN,” Asian Journal of Governance and Policy, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 145–162, 2022.

[12] D. Hung, J. Mishra, and R. Kapil, “Large boards and decision-making efficiency: Evidence from Asia-Pacific,” Journal of Financial Management Studies, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 210–229, 2019.

[13] J. Mishra and R. Kapil, “Corporate board size and coordination cost: Revisiting agency theory,” Journal of Governance and Economics, vol. 9, pp. 142–157, 2018.

[14] M. Pucheta-Martinez and R. Alvarez, “Evaluating board effectiveness: Holistic approaches in corporate governance,” European Management Review, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 175–194, 2020.

[15] A. Sobhan, “The role of board diversity and independence in firm performance,” Journal of Accounting and Governance, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 250–268, 2021.

[16] T. Varghese and S. Sasidharan, “Competency-based assessment of board effectiveness,” Corporate Governance: An International Review, vol. 28, pp. 320–335, 2020.

[17] M. Nyamekye, P. Uddin, and S. Zhang, “Liquidity and firm value: Evidence from banking sectors,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 65, pp. 104–119, 2024.

[18] T. Vu, D. Thu Minh, and Q. Ho, “Liquidity, leverage, and financial performance: Empirical evidence from manufacturing firms,” Asian Finance Journal, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 70–87, 2020.

[19] S. Zhang, “Liquidity and stock return: Evidence from Asian markets,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 12–29, 2021.

[20] M. Uddin, M. Nyamekye, and A. Rahman, “Leverage, liquidity, and firm value,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 110–125, 2022.

[21] H. Kim, S. Lee, and J. Park, “Financial performance determinants: Evidence from emerging economies,” Asia-Pacific Economic Studies, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 199–214, 2024.

[22] Widyatama, R., “Analisis rasio keuangan terhadap kinerja perusahaan,” Jurnal Akuntansi Indonesia, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 122–135, 2021.

[23] Kasmir, Analisis Laporan Keuangan, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2012.

[24] N. Assenga, M. Amedi, and T. Mustafa, “Corporate board structure and financial performance,” African Journal of Accounting and Finance, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 50–65, 2018.

[25] S. Black and W. Kim, “Board size and firm monitoring effectiveness,” Journal of Corporate Finance, vol. 18, pp. 101–118, 2012.

[26] S. Johl, R. Hung, and F. Martínez, “The moderating role of board composition on firm investment decisions,” Corporate Governance and Finance Review, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 330–345, 2015.

[27] H. Lai, A. Quoc, and T. Nguyen, “Working capital management in SMEs: Evidence from Spain,” Small Business Economics Review, vol. 14, pp. 99–114, 2022.

[28] A. Quoc, D. Thu Minh, and Q. Ho, “Firm size and financial efficiency: Comparative evidence from ASEAN,” Journal of Financial Strategy, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 233–247, 2024.

[29] G. Haneda and A. Ono, “R&D intensity and firm innovation by size category,” Economic Innovation Journal, vol. 17, pp. 101–120, 2022.

[30] K. Sung Tae, “Firm growth and resource dynamics in small and medium enterprises,” Korean Journal of Business Research, vol. 12, pp. 80–98, 2023.

[31] Y. Gharaibeh, “Firm size and performance relationships: Empirical evidence from Jordan,” Arab Economic Review, vol. 25, pp. 49–63, 2020.

[32] C. Ho, M. Susilo, and L. Lai, “Firm size, profitability, and performance efficiency,” Asian Accounting Review, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 120–135, 2020.

[33] P. Alexy and A. Arilova, “Organizational learning and firm longevity,” Journal of Management Development, vol. 39, pp. 210–225, 2023.

[34] M. Pervan, T. Bakker, and P. Josefy, “Firm age, profitability, and efficiency: Evidence from EU firms,” European Journal of Business Research, vol. 14, pp. 177–195, 2019.

[35] M. Quoc and H. Thu Minh, “Firm age, experience, and reputation in performance,” Business Economics Review, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 290–310, 2024.

[36] F. Fiador, “Firm age and cash conversion cycle in Ghana,” African Finance Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 55–68, 2016.

[37] M. Wasiuzzaman and P. Arumugam, “Working capital and firm maturity,” Asian Finance Review, vol. 7, pp. 145–159, 2013.

[38] S. Boubakri, “Firm maturity, governance, and risk strategy,” International Journal of Finance and Policy, vol. 18, pp. 87–102, 2016.

[39] S. Hasan, F. Varghese, and T. Sasidharan, “Age, efficiency, and vulnerability in firm performance,” Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 144–159, 2024.

[40] R. Dey, M. Chen, and P. Sharma, “Liquidity risk and profitability,” Accounting and Finance Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 220–239, 2023.

[41] A. Batten and X. Vo, “Liquidity and market structure in emerging markets,” Journal of International Financial Markets, vol. 57, pp. 11–25, 2019.

[42] X. Chen, Y. Honli, and C. Honglie, “Liquidity and profitability in manufacturing firms,” Asia-Pacific Business Review, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 98–112, 2018.

[43] Y. Honli, C. Honglie, and D. Sharma, “Cash flow, liquidity, and performance,” Global Finance Studies, vol. 12, pp. 120–138, 2019.

[44] R. Sharma and S. Sarin, “Liquidity management and business continuity,” Corporate Finance Insights, vol. 18, pp. 70–85, 2024.

[45] M. Alim, N. Saifuddin, and P. Sifullah, “Liquidity and financial efficiency in ASEAN,” Asian Accounting and Economics Review, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 15–28, 2021.

[46] A. Al Nimer, M. Siahaan, and S. Solimon, “Liquidity and financial performance across industries,” Journal of Corporate Financial Analysis, vol. 31, pp. 55–71, 2024.

[47] P. Ibhagui and R. Olokoyo, “Leverage and firm value in developing economies,” Emerging Market Finance Journal, vol. 13, pp. 112–128, 2018.

[48] N. Saifuddin, P. Sifullah, and A. Singh, “Debt-to-equity ratio and firm performance,” International Business and Finance Review, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 80–94, 2015.

[49] J. Singh and V. Bansal, “Leverage structure and profitability: Revisiting pecking order theory,” Indian Journal of Management Studies, vol. 10, pp. 170–188, 2016.

[50] D. Garcia Gomez, “Leverage and firm performance: Empirical evidence,” Spanish Economic Review, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 230–249, 2020.

[51] S. Sifullah, M. Saifuddin, and N. Al Nimer, “Trade-off and capital structure dynamics,” Journal of Financial Economics Asia, vol. 33, pp. 188–202, 2024.

[52] H. Honi, “Board size and firm performance: Evidence from Indonesian companies,” Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 44–59, 2020.

[53] Fadilah, R., “Pengaruh komisaris independen terhadap kinerja keuangan,” Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Indonesia, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 77–85, 2017.

[54] T. Nguyen and P. Dao, “Liquidity ratio and firm profitability: Evidence from Vietnam,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Finance and Economics, vol. 22, pp. 95–111, 2022.

[55] T. Elumaro and M. Umar, “Leverage and firm performance in emerging economies,” Journal of Financial Policy Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 121–136, 2023.