NAVIGATING ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN ALGORITHMIC DECISION-MAKING: A CASE-BASED STUDY OF FINTECH PLATFORMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/jiab.v5i1.1044Keywords:
Algorithmic Accountability, Ethical Decision-Making, Algorithmic Bias, Fintech Governance, Transparency in AI.Abstract
Advancements in fintech algorithms have improved decision-making efficiency in credit scoring, investment advice, and financial product offerings. However, these automated systems raise ethical concerns related to algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, and accountability. Social inequalities embedded in historical data risk reinforcing discrimination in digital financial services, particularly in Southeast Asia’s evolving regulatory environment. This study explores ethical dilemmas in algorithmic decision-making across fintech platforms and assesses company responses. Using a qualitative multiple-case study of three Indonesian fintech firms in peer-to-peer lending, e-wallet, and robo-advisory sectors, data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and internal document analysis. Results indicate algorithmic bias as the most critical issue, followed by transparency and accountability gaps. Peer-to-peer lending firms demonstrate better ethical readiness via regular audits, while others show limited mitigation efforts. The study proposes a conceptual model emphasizing fairness, transparency, and accountability, offering practical insights for regulators and industry to strengthen ethical governance in Indonesia’s AI-based fintech ecosystem.
References
Aldboush, H. H. H., & Ferdous, M. (2023). Building Trust in Fintech: An Analysis of Ethical and Privacy Considerations in the Intersection of Big Data, AI, and Customer Trust. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs11030090
Avnoon, N., Kotliar, D. M., & Rivnai-Bahir, S. (2023). Contextualizing the ethics of algorithms: A socio-professional approach. New Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221145728
Bahangulu, J. K., & Owusu-berko, L. (2025). Algorithmic bias , data ethics , and governance : Ensuring fairness, transparency and compliance in AI-powered business analytics applications. 2.
Cheong, B. C. (2024). Transparency and accountability in AI systems: safeguarding wellbeing in the age of algorithmic decision-making. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2024.1421273
Corrêa, N. K., Santos, J. W., Galvão, C., Pasetti, M., Schiavon, D., Naqvi, F., Hossain, R., & Oliveira, N. De. (2024). Crossing the principle–practice gap in AI ethics with ethical problem-solving. AI and Ethics, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00469-8
Franklin, G., Stephens, R., Piracha, M., Tiosano, S., Lehouillier, F., Koppel, R., & Elkin, P. L. (2024). The Sociodemographic Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms: A Biomedical Informatics Perspective. Life, 14(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14060652
Kaffee, L.-A., Atanasova, P., & Rogers, A. (2025). Local Differences, Global Lessons: Insights from Organisation Policies for International Legislation. http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05737
Khan, A. A., Akbar, M. A., Fahmideh, M., Liang, P., Waseem, M., Ahmad, A., Niazi, M., & Abrahamsson, P. (2023). AI Ethics: An Empirical Study on the Views of Practitioners and Lawmakers. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 10(6), 2971–2984. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2023.3251729
Kim, S., Lessmann, S., Andreeva, G., & Rovatsos, M. (2023). Fair Models in Credit: Intersectional Discrimination and the Amplification of Inequity. http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.02680
Lalaina, S. (2023). Influence of Nano-Sio2 and Steel Fiber on Mechanical and Microstructural Properties of Red Mud-Based Geopolymer Concrete. August 2023.
Lam, K., Lange, B., Blili-Hamelin, B., Davidovic, J., Brown, S., & Hasan, A. (2024). A Framework for Assurance Audits of Algorithmic Systems. 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT 2024, 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658957
Lange, B., Keeling, G., McCroskery, A., Zevenbergen, B., Blascovich, S., Pedersen, K., Lentz, A., & Agüera y Arcas, B. (2023). Engaging engineering teams through moral imagination: a bottom-up approach for responsible innovation and ethical culture change in technology companies. AI and Ethics, 5(1), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00381-7
Mavrogiorgos, K., Kiourtis, A., Mavrogiorgou, A., Menychtas, A., & Kyriazis, D. (2024). Bias in Machine Learning: A Literature Review. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 14(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14198860
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6). https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607
Orbán, F., & Stefkovics, Á. (2025). Trust in artificial intelligence: A survey experiment to assess trust in algorithmic decision-making. AI and Society, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02237-6
Pant, A., Hoda, R., Spiegler, S. V., Tantithamthavorn, C., & Turhan, B. (2024). Ethics in the Age of AI: An Analysis of AI Practitioners’ Awareness and Challenges. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.1145/3635715
Pellandini-Simányi, L. (2024). Algorithmic classifications in credit marketing: How marketing shapes inequalities. Marketing Theory, 24(2), 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931231160828
Pfeiffer, J., Gutschow, J., Haas, C., Möslein, F., Maspfuhl, O., Borgers, F., & Alpsancar, S. (2023). Algorithmic Fairness in AI: An Interdisciplinary View. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 65(2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00787-x
Rojon, C., Okupe, A., & McDowall, A. (2021). Utilization and development of systematic reviews in management research: What do we know and where do we go from here? International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(2), 191–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12245
Seppala, P., & Matecka, M. (2024). AI and discriminative decisions in recruitment: Challenging the core assumptions. Big Data and Society, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241235872
Siddique, S., Haque, M. A., George, R., Gupta, K. D., Gupta, D., & Faruk, M. J. H. (2024). Survey on Machine Learning Biases and Mitigation Techniques. Digital, 4(1), 1–68. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital4010001
Siti Aishah et al. (2023). Influence of Psychological Well-Being and School Factors on Delinquency , During the Covid-19 Period Among Secondary School Students in Selected Schools in Nakuru County , Kenya. VII(2454), 1175–1189. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS
Westerstrand, S. (2024). Reconstructing AI Ethics Principles: Rawlsian Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Science and Engineering Ethics, 30(5), 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-024-00507-y
Wuttke, A., Rauchfleisch, A., & Jungherr, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Government: Why People Feel They Lose Control. 1–39. http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01085
Yalcin, G., Themeli, E., Stamhuis, E., Philipsen, S., & Puntoni, S. (2023). Perceptions of Justice By Algorithms. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 31(2), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09312-z
Yang, Q., & Lee, Y.-C. (2024). Ethical AI in Financial Inclusion: The Role of Algorithmic Fairness on User Satisfaction and Recommendation. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 8(9), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8090105
Zilka, M., Fogliato, R., Hron, J., Butcher, B., Ashurst, C., & Weller, A. (2023). The Progression of Disparities within the Criminal Justice System: Differential Enforcement and Risk Assessment Instruments. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 1553–1569. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594099
