NIAT BELI MASYARAKAT TERHADAP DISTRO LABEL CLOTHING DI SURAKARTA

Titin Hargyatni; Diani Putri Utami

doi:10.51903/manajemen.v2i1.188

Titin Hargyatni STIE Studi Ekonomi Modern
Diani Putri Utami STIE Studi Ekonomi Modern

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51903/manajemen.v2i1.188

Keywords: risk, product quality, relative price, product value, purchase intention

Abstract

This study aims to determine the purchase intention of private label clothing in Surakarta which has a relationship from the effect of risk, product quality, relative price and value in Rown Division distributions. The sample in this study were 100 respondents who bought Rown Division's products. This study uses a non-probability sampling technique with a purposive sampling approach, namely a sampling technique with certain criteria. The data analysis method used is multiple linear regression including t test, F test, coefficient of determination. The results showed that the variables of product value, relative price, product quality and risk had a positive and significant effect on people's buying intentions for clothing products. The magnitude of the coefficient of determination (R2) obtained a value of 60.9%, which means that the variables of product value, relative price, product quality and ris in this study were able to build purchase intentions of 60.9%, while the remaining 39.1% was explained by other factors outside from this research

References

[1] Ngobo, Paul-Valentin.”Private label share, branding strategy and store loyalty”. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Volume 18, July 2011, Page 259-270, DOI 10.1016/j.jretconser.2010.11.007
[2] Batra, R. and Sinha, I. Consumer-Level Factors Moderating the Success of Private Label Brands. Journal of Retailing,.Volume 76, 2000, Page 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00027-0
[3] Corstjens, M. and Lal, R. Building Store Loyalty through Store Brands. Journal of Marketing Research, May 2010. Volume 37, 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.3.281.18781
[4] Abdurachman, “Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Menimbulkan Kecenderungan Minat Beli Konsumen Sarung (Studi Perilaku Konsumen sarung di Jawa Timur) “, Jurnal Universitas Kristen Petra Surabaya.2004.
[5] McDougall, G.H.G. and Levesque, T.Customer Satisfaction with Services: Putting Perceived Value into the Equation. Journal of Services Marketing,2000, vol.14, 392-410. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040010340937
[6] Yang, Z., Jun, M. and Peterson, R.T. Measuring Customer Perceived Online Service Quality: Scale Development and Managerial Implications.2004. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24, 1149-1174. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570410563278
[7] Ralston, S. M.. Letter from the Editor. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 2003. 40(1), 6–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194360304000101.
[8] Wangenheim,Florian and Bayon. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science .The Chain From Customer Satisfaction via Word-of-Mouth Referrals to New Customer Acquisition.2007.Volume 35.page 233-249. Doi : http:// 10.1007/s11747-007-0037-1
[9] Teas,R and Agarwal,Sanjeev. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science - J ACAD MARK SCI. The Effects of Extrinsic Product Cues on Consumers’ Perceptions of Quality, Sacrifice, and Value.2020.Volume 28.Page 278-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300282008
[10] Hellier.et.al. European Journal of Marketing. Customer Repurchase Intention: A General Structural Equation Model . Volume 37. 2003. Page 1762-1800. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310495456
[11] Sweeney,J and Soutar, Geoffrey. Consumer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale. Journal of Retailing. Volume 77. 2010, page 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0
[12] Bosnjak et al. (2006). Predicting and explaining the propensity to bid in online auctions : a comparison of two action-theoretical models. 116 (April) , 102–116.
[13] Hermawan Kartajaya. 2000. Marketing Plus 2000 Siasat Memenangkan Persaingan Global. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
[14] Kotler, Philip. 2003. Marketing Management 11ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
[15] M. Iqbal Hasan. 2002. Pokok-Pokok Materi Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
[16] Hermawan Kartajaya. 2006. Hermawan Kartajaya on Marketing Mix Seri 9 Elemen Marketing. Bandung: PT. Mizan Pustaka.\
[17] M. R. Dinawan, "ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN (S," Jurnal Sains Pemasaran Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Marketing Science), vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 335 - 369, Dec. 2010. https://doi.org/10.14710/jspi.v9i3.335 - 369
[18] Kotler, Philip dan Amstrong, 2014. Principle Of Marketing, 15th edition. New Jersey: pearson Prentice Hall.
[19] Paul, J. Petter, dan Olson, Jerry c. 2013. Perilaku Konsumen dan Strategi Pemasaran, Edisi 9, Buku 2, Alih Bahasa: Diah Tantri Dwiandani, 2014, Salemba empat, Jakarta.
[20] Kotler, Philip dan Lane, Keller Kevin. 2012. Marketing Management 14th edition. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall
[21] Husein,Umar. Riset Pemasaran dan Perilaku Konsumen.Jakarta.PT,Gramedia Pustaka Utama